Shubhada R. Bora v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Nashik & Ors

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (946) WRIT PETITION NO.5702 OF 2022 Shubhada R. Bora Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Nashik & Ors. …Petitioner …Respondents WITH(949) WRIT PETITION NO.5822 OF 2022WITH (950) WRIT PETITION NO.11188 OF 2022WITH(951) WRIT PETITION NO.14803 OF 2022WITH (1004) WRIT PETITION NO.3147 OF 2023 Mr. Devendra Jain, i/b. Ms. Radha Halbe, for Petition in WP/5702/2022 & 5822/2022.Ms.Deepa Khare, i/b. Mint & Confreres, for Petitioner in WP/11188/2022.Mr. Kumar U. Kale, for Petitioner in WP/14803/2022.Mr. Suyog Bhave with Mr. Vikas Poojary, Mr. Yash Prakash, i/b. PDS Legal, for Petitioner in WP/3147/2023.Mr. Suresh Kumar, for Respondents-Revenue in WP/5702/2022, 5822/2022 & WP/3147/2023. Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma, with Ms. Samiksha Kanani, for Respondents-Revenue in WP/14803/2022. CORAM: K. R. SHRIRAM &DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.9[th] May 2024 DATED: PC:- 1.We are informed by counsel for Petitioner/s that these Petitions will be covered by the judgment in Hexaware Technologies Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 15(1)(2) Mumbai and Ors.[1 ]Counsel for Respondent/s concur. Digitally signedby RAJURAJUDATTATRAYADATTATRAYAGAIKWADGAIKWADDate:2024.05.1320:24:14 +0530 2.Therefore, the notices and orders impugned in these petitions are quashed and set aside. In case any re-assessment order is passed, the same also will stand quashed. So also, consequential demand notice or penalty notice will also stand quashed and set aside. 3.Petitions disposed accordingly. 4.In view of disposal of petitions, interim application, if any,pending therein shall also stand disposed. 5.Whichever contention raised in the Petition not covered by theHexaware Technologies (Supra) is kept open to be raised, should theneed arise. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)