Shweta Mehta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), New Central Revenue Building,Janpath, Jaipur
High Court
30 Apr 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shweta Mehta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), New Central Revenue Building,Janpath, Jaipur
Date of order
30 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
2012-2013
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Shweta Mehta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), New Central Revenue Building,Janpath, Jaipur, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed in the sameterms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21466/2019
Shweta Mehta W/o Shri Avinash Chordia, Aged About 33 Years,Resident Of B-33, Prabhu Marg, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), New Central Revenue Building,Janpath, Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dileep ShivpuriFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sandeep Pathak
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
30/04/2024
1.This petition is filed seeking quashing of impugned noticeissued under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated30.03.2019 for Assessment Year 2012-2013.
2.Learned counsel for the parties are at ad-idem that the issueinvolved in the present petition is covered by the decision of thisCourt in D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.18363/2019 (Shyam SunderKhandelwal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) decided on19.03.2024.
3.In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed in the sameterms.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Anu/CHANDAN/23
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue