Case LawHigh Court › Siddharth Jhajharia v. The Assistant Com...

Siddharth Jhajharia v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 34 Kolkata (Jao) & Ors

High Court 01 May 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Siddharth Jhajharia v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 34 Kolkata (Jao) & Ors
Date of order
01 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Siddharth Jhajharia v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 34 Kolkata (Jao) & Ors, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: 5.With the above observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

11 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA 01.05.2025 CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION sb Ct 5 APPELLATE SIDE sb Ct 5 APPELLATE SIDE WPA 6501 of 2025 Siddharth Jhajharia Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 34 Kolkata (JAO) & Ors. Mr. Aman Agarwal Mr. Debayan Sen Ms. Mahima Cholega … For the petitioner. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee … For the Income Tax Authorities Mr. Sankar Sarkar Mr. Piyas Choudhury … For Union of India. 1.Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. record. 2.The petitioner is aggrieved by the failure on the part of the income tax authorities to decide the petitioner’s applications under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of the assessment years 2021-22, 2022-23 and 2023-24, forming Annexures P-5, P-6 and P-7 respectively to the instant petitioner. of the income tax authorities to decide the petitioner’s applications under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of the assessment years 2021-22, 2022-23 and 2023-24, forming Annexures P-5, P-6 and P-7 respectively to the instant petitioner. 3.Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and noting that the aforesaid applications are pending, I am of the view that the concerned respondent should take appropriate steps for disposal of the aforesaid applications all the respective parties and noting that the aforesaid applications are pending, I am of the view that the concerned respondent should take appropriate steps for disposal of the aforesaid applications all dated 28[th]February, 2025, which had been received by the department on 3[rd] March, 2025, as expeditiously as possible, but not later than 10[th] of June, 2025. 4.Since no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for, the allegation made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents. 5.With the above observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. petition stands disposed of. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan