Siemens Information System Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax..& Ors
High Court
17 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Siemens Information System Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax..& Ors
Date of order
17 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Siemens Information System Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax..& Ors, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2387 OF 2006
Siemens Information System Ltd... ..Petitioner
Vs.
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax..& Ors ..................................Respondents
Mr. A.K. Jasani, for the Appellant.Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, for the Respondents.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 17TH OCTOBER 2007
P.C.
.Rule. Heard forthwith. The reasons to believe as
set out in the communication addressed to the petitioner byletter dated 31st May, 2006 were that the assessee has toset off losses of Non 10A units against income of 10A unitsand thereafter, claim deduction under Section 10A of theI.T.Act on the balance amount. The second reason was the
decision of Bombay ITAT "E" Bench in the case of Navin
Bharat Industries Ltd. vs. DCIT 90 ITD 1.
2.Similar issue had come up for consideration in Writ
Petition No.2386 of 2006 which we have disposed of by orderdated 1th October, 2007. We have held that both the reasonswould amount to mere change of opinion and consequently thereopening would be illegal and null and void. Consideringthe above rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
In the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as
to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.