Sig. Prakash Laxman Gaonkar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1
High Court
15 Apr 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Sig. Prakash Laxman Gaonkar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1
Date of order
15 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sig. Prakash Laxman Gaonkar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: Accepting the aforesaid statements, since nothing survivesin the petition for adjudication, the same is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.77 OF 2025
JANASEVA URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT
SOCIETY LIMITED, THR. ITS AUTH.
SIG. PRAKASH LAXMAN GAONKAR
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,
MARGAO AND 4 ORS
... PETITIONER
... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Rahul Sarda (Through VC) with Ms. Eesha Dukle and Mr.
Gaurang Panandiker, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Ms. Susan Linhares, Assistant Central Government Standing Counselfor Respondent nos. 1 and 2.
Mr Purushottam Karpe and Ms Samiksha Narvekar, Advocates forrespondent No.4.
Ms Shruti S. Loleyekar, Law Officer of Bank - Respondent No.5present in person.
CORAM:- BHARATI DANGRE &NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.
DATED :- 15th April, 2025
P.C.:
In the wake of the order dated 07.04.2025, Ms Linhares,
learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2, on instructions,
make a statement that the recovery notices dated 06.09.2024 and29.01.2025, shall be withdrawn within a period of 10 days from today.
On instructions, she also make a statement that thepetitioner shall be permitted to operate its bank account forthwith.
Accepting the aforesaid statements, since nothing survivesin the petition for adjudication, the same is disposed of.
NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J.
BHARATI DANGRE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.