In Silk & Art Silk Manufacturersassociation Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Taxpune, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 5 of 1997
Silk & Art Silk ManufacturersAssociation Ltd.
: Applicant
v/s
The Commissioner of Income TaxPune: Respondent
Mr. S.J. Mehta Advocate for appellant
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan Advocate for respondent
Coram : Dr.S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date: 23.7.2008
P.C.
reference. In view thereof rule stands discharged.
Reference is returned back unanswered.
S.J. Kathawalla,J. Dr. S. Radhakrishnan,J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.