Case LawHigh Court › Siltronic (India) Limited v. The Commiss...

Siltronic (India) Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 26 Jul 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Siltronic (India) Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Jul 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Siltronic (India) Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of this statement made by the OfficialLiquidator reference is returned unanswered and disposed of with noorder as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICGTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 122 of 1990 Siltronic (India) Limited. ... Applicant. vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax ..... Respondent Mr. P. G. Rao, Official Liquidator present. Mr. Ashok Kotangale, Sr. Counsel for Applicant. CORAM: V. C. DAGA AND A. S. AGUIAR JJ. Date: July,26, 2005. P. C.: 1. This is a reference made under section 256 (1) of the Income TaxAct , 1961, at the instance of the Applicant- company. The assesseecompany is in liquidation. Consequently, Official Liquidator wasnoticed. He appeared and filed affidavit stating therein that since itis a pre- liquidation reference he does not want to press the reliefsprayed for therein. In view of this statement made by the OfficialLiquidator reference is returned unanswered and disposed of with noorder as to costs. (V. C. DAGA J. ) -x- (A. S. AGUIAR J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan