Silvertoss Shoppers Pvt. Ltd v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, West Bengal & Sikkim & Ors
High Court
30 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Silvertoss Shoppers Pvt. Ltd v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, West Bengal & Sikkim & Ors
Date of order
30 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Silvertoss Shoppers Pvt. Ltd v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, West Bengal & Sikkim & Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
30.08.2022. p.b.Sl. No.10.
W.P.A. 18644 of 2022
Silvertoss Shoppers Pvt. Ltd. Vs.Principal Chief Commissioner ofIncome Tax, West Bengal & Sikkim& Ors.
Mr. Arnab Chakraborty,Mr. Kushagra Shah.
……..for the petitioner.
Mr. Om Narayan Rai.
……..for the UOI.
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned order of the CIT (Appeals) dated 6[th] July, 2022confirming the intimation order passed by the assessingofficer under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961disallowing certain claims of the petitioner not on meritrather on the ground that there was a delay of 26 minutesand 40 seconds in filing the return relating to the relevantassessment year. Petitioner has provided detailedexplanation about technical glitches petitioner faced onthe portal in filing the return in question. Petitioner alsochallenges such intimation order dated 11[th] April, 2020under Section 143(1) of the Act. On perusal of thedocuments annexed to the writ petition and pleadings andsubmission made by the petitioner, I am of the consideredview that disallowance of the claim in question made by
the petitioner only on the technical ground of delay of 26minutes and 40 seconds in filing the return instead ofmerit, is unjustifiable and not sustainable in law and insuch exceptional circumstances instead of availability ofalternative remedy, both the order of CIT (Appeal) dated 6[th]July, 2022 and the intimation order dated 11[th] April, 2020are quashed and the matter is returned back to theassessing officer concerned to pass a fresh intimationorder under Section 143(1) of the Act on merit of the claimmade by the petitioner in its return which was rejected bythe respondent assessing officer in his aforesaid impugnedintimation order and such fresh order shall be passed bythe assessing officer concerned within ten weeks from thedate of communication of this order.
With this observation and direction, this writpetition being WPA No.18644 of 2022 stands disposed of.
(Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.