Sima Chowdhury v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 50(1), Kolkata & Ors
High Court
27 Sep 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Sima Chowdhury v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 50(1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
27 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sima Chowdhury v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 50(1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal along with theconnected application are dismissed as withdrawn withliberty to the appellant to approach the concerned authority in accordance with law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
27.09.2022
10
ns/pg Ct.16
M.A.T. No.441 of 2022
With
I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2022
Sima Chowdhury
Vs.
Income Tax Officer, Ward 50(1), Kolkata & Ors.
Mr. Anil Kumar Dugar , Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee ….. for the appellant.
Mr. Amit Sharma
…. for the respondents.
Learned Advocate appearing for the appellantseeks permission to withdraw the appeal and pursue thematter before the concerned authority. It is submitted bythe learned Advocate that this Court may consider waivingthe cost, which has been imposed on the appellant.
Consideringthepeculiarfactsandcircumstances of the case and that the appellant seeks towithdraw the appeal and go before the concernedauthority, we delete that portion of the order passed bythe learned Single Bench imposing costs on the appellant.
Accordingly, the appeal along with theconnected application are dismissed as withdrawn withliberty to the appellant to approach the concerned
authority in accordance with law. However, theimposition of costs stands deleted.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, ifapplied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously uponcompliance of all legal formalities.
( T. S. Sivagnanam, J.)
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.