Simran Raheja v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward Xv (3), Chennai β 600 034
High Court
06 Dec 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Simran Raheja v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward Xv (3), Chennai β 600 034
Date of order
06 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
The order β as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Simran Raheja v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward Xv (3), Chennai β 600 034, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence this tax case appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below β read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
T.C.Appeal.No.321 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.12.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTH
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
T.C.A.No.321 of 2012andM.P.No.1 of 2012
Simran Raheja
.. Appellant
vs
The Income Tax Officer,Ward XV (3), Chennai β 600 034. .. Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench 'D', dated 03.10.2011 in ITA No.2075/Mds/2010 for Assessment Year 2007-08.
For Appellant::No appearance
For Respondent::Mr.T.RavikumarSenior Standing Counsel
T.C.Appeal.No.321 of 2012
DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,J.
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
When the matter was listed on 25.10.2024, 20.11.2024 & 04.12.2024 there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today. The position remains status quo even today. Hence this tax case appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J]06.12.2024
slIndex:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:YesSpeaking order
ToThe Income Tax Officer,Ward XV (3), Chennai β 600 034.
T.C.A.No.321 of 2012
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CAβclient relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.