Case LawHigh Court › Sinai® v. Respondents:1

Sinai® v. Respondents:1

High Court 10 Feb 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Sinai® v. Respondents:1
Date of order
10 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sinai® v. Respondents:1, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT QF CHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION (T) N0. /2014 <-" PETITIONER Aarti Colonizer Company, having its office atAtlaniCorporation,nearRailway-crossing,Pandri,Raipur,throughitsPartner,ShriRajesh Atlani, S/o Shri Gola Rain Atlani, agedabout 50 years, office at Atlani Corporation,near Railway-crossing, Pandri,Raipur, policestationPandri,Tahsil&DistrictRaipur(Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS:1. Commissioner of IncomeTax,officeof theCommissioner of Income Tax, Central RevenueBuilding, Civil Lines, Raipur, Tahsil & DistrictRaipur (Chhattisgarh)Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, office oftheCommissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(1),CentralRevenueBuilding,3rdFloor,RoomNo.408, Civil Lines, Raipur, TahsilSc, DistrictRaipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), CivilLines,Raipur,Tahsil&DistrictRaipur(Chhattisgarh) 3./4. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, office oftheCommissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(1),Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur,Tahsll 8s District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA ftji!i?a 's^ '*iit)i<7i<^, '©'ii-ns,Ts^fray^^^..^M.1.2^... ^i^ ^^ (.^T^^)^^sn^r-^TRqR;^l^Tf['H]T^^T[Ti'^'?yR]?T«nan^t aitijss"•atfOTSiTOI; nuim snnvastava. J.shri fiahsh Surana, counsej for the petitioner.Shri Anand Dadariya,for the respondeiHeard.Learned counsel for iheItioner contines hls prayer only for adirecnon to tiie Appellate Authorit^to dedde his appea! expeditiousiy. !t Issubmitted ihat the petjtioner!SJllsdSHSDOgalQOSiHSt ofdsr ofassessment before C!T[Anpeals]N(k.327/13-14.328/13-14 & 32S/13-14-Learned counset for ttieespondente opposs prayw for earlydsposal of appeal by submitiinjit system has been evolved forofappeel before fhe CompetentAi^-ity.Tsking into consideration fti^fe submssions of Searned counse! for ftseparfies,[it][ would][ be]proper[to][ dis^]^ose[off][ Uiis]petifion[wilh][ a][ direction][ to]Appellate Autfiority to decide theFiSTS sppeal as eariy as possbie Inaccordance wilh ite own svstem ofl^ispossl[ofappsal.]The petition is accordinglyIsDosed ott.Manindl'a[MoshdanShrivastava]Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan