Case Law › High Court › Single;Emh v. Espondents

Single;Emh v. Espondents

High Court 10 Feb 2014 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

10 Feb 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Single;Emh v. Espondents, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Single;emh BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OFCHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR Y3) WRIT PET TION TNO. 2014 PETITIONER:y“Abhishek Atlani, S/o Shri Surssh[Atlani,][ aged]”§§,\}J‘about29years,R/o4 ’Ralpur;BynglowKhamarfiihv\‘“§~Road,ShankafNagar,p,olicestatlon%(’ShankarNagar,Tahsil85DistrictRafpurV(Chhattisgarh)”§§,\}J‘about29years,R/o4 ’Ralpur;BynglowKhamarfiihv\‘“§~Road,ShankafNagar,p,olicestatlon%(’ShankarNagar,Tahsil85DistrictRafpurV(Chhattisgarh) VERSUS ESPONDENTS: l/CommissionsrofIncomeTax,officeoftheCommissioner of Income Tax,Central RevenueBuilding,Civil Lines,Raipur, Tahsil85DistrictRaipur (Chhattisgarh) /, Deputy Commissionerof Income Tax,officeoftheCommissionerof Income Tax,Circle2(1),CentralRevenueBuilding,3rdFloor,RoomNo.408,CivilLines,Raipur,Tahsil85DistrictRaipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. /3. CommissionerofIncomeTax(Appeals),CivilLines,Raipur,Tahsil85DistrictRaipur(Chhattisgarh) Assistant Commissioner of Income[Tax,][ office][ of]theCommissioner of Income[Tax,]Circle2(1),Central RevenueBuilding,CivilLines,Raipur,Tahsil & District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA l Regina Wmtg£CD..A\.9:..(§/2g.15y a 20 ’gaaa) a?%.§$ W {my

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.