Sitan Sheikh v. Union Of India Through Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
19 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Sitan Sheikh v. Union Of India Through Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Sitan Sheikh v. Union Of India Through Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: 2)Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as being infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No. 5818 of 2024
Sitan Sheikh, aged about 35 years, Son of Gulam Rasul, resident of Nayagram, Khanpur, P.O. & P.S. Pakur, District – Pakur (Jharkhand).
…. Petitioner.
Versus
1. Union of India through Principal Commissioner of Income Tax having its office at RC4J+4J7, Aayakar Bhawan, Luby Circular Road, Dhanbad. having its office at RC4J+4J7, Aayakar Bhawan, Luby Circular Road, Dhanbad.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), having its office at RC4J+4J7, Aayakar Bhawan, Luby Circular Road, Dhanbad. office at RC4J+4J7, Aayakar Bhawan, Luby Circular Road, Dhanbad.
3. The Income Tax Officer, Dumka having its office at Income Tax Office, Krishnapuri, Williams Town, Deoghar. Office, Krishnapuri, Williams Town, Deoghar.
….. Respondents
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
---------
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ankit Apurva, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Sr. S.C. Mr. Anurag Vijay, Jr. S.C.
---------
03/Dated: 19.11.2024
1)Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that this writ
petition has become infructuous.
2)Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as being
infructuous.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.