Case LawHigh Court › Sjc/7/1998 Of Comissioner Of Income Tax...

Sjc/7/1998 Of Comissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.tirumala Pictures, Cuttack

High Court 08 Dec 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Sjc/7/1998 Of Comissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.tirumala Pictures, Cuttack
Date of order
08 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
1985-86
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Sjc/7/1998 Of Comissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.tirumala Pictures, Cuttack, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

S.J.C. No.07 of 1998 04. 08.12.2015 S.J.C. Nos.07,08 and 09 of 1998 Although these matters are listed for orders, Mr.Acharya, learned Sr.Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department sought to challenge the common order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in R.A.Nos.2,3 and 4-CTK of 1997 under Annexure-5 for the assessment years 1986-87, 1987-88 and 1988-89 raising various questions of law for reference. The Tribunal in a detail order has dealt with each of the issues and come to a conclusion that no question of law arises since the Tribunal has reached at a conclusion basing on appreciation of evidence and placing reliance on a decision in the case of Sir Shadilal Sugar & General Mills Ltd. Vrs. C.I.T., 168 I.T.R. 705 (S.C.). The Tribunal came to hold that so far as question No.1 is concerned, the Tribunal held that since the assessee had filed the application in Form No.11 for the assessment year 1985-86 and in Form No.12 for the subsequent years of assessment, the assessee was entitled to registration of the firm in the first year and continuation of registration had to be granted for the subsequent years. So far as question Nos.2 and 3 are concerned, the Tribunal came to hold that the same do not arise out of the order of the Tribunal as they are only against certain observations in the Tribunals order and are merely academic. After perusing the impugned order as well as the original order passed by the Tribunal, we find no reason to differ from the views expressed by the Tribunal and also find that no issue arises for admission of these SJCs and accordingly, the SJCs stand dismissed. Free copy of this order be handed over to the learned Sr.Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department. .... I. Mahanty,J. ........ Dr.D.P.Choudhury, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan