Case LawHigh Court › S.j.kathawalla, Jj v. Tata

S.j.kathawalla, Jj v. Tata

High Court 24 Jun 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
S.j.kathawalla, Jj v. Tata
Date of order
24 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In S.j.kathawalla, Jj v. Tata, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1550 OF 2019 The Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-4 … Petitioner V/s.Van Oord Degrading and Marine Contractors BV… Respondent --- Ms.Vaibhavi Gala with Ms.Shaista Hadi i/by Mr.CharanjeetChanderpal for the Petitioner.Mr.Nishant Thakkar i/by Mr.Atul Jasani for theRespondent. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : JUNE 24, 2019. P.C.:- 1.This petition is filed by the Department challengingan order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunalextending stay in favour of the assessee beyond theperiod of 360 days. Department contends that theaction of the Tribunal was beyond its authority. Thisissue is squarely covered by the judgment of this Courtin case of Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Tata Priya Soparkar 28 wp 1550-19-o Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd.[1], though we areinformed that Department has filed appeal before theSupreme Court. Be that as it may, learned counsel for therespondent-assessee stated that by now the appealitself has been disposed of by the Tribunal. He places onrecord the copy of the order dated 31[st] May, 2019. In thatview of the order, this petition has become infructuous.Petition disposed of accordingly. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)….
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan