S.k. Industries Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
11 Feb 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
S.k. Industries Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
11 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In S.k. Industries Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
7.
+ W.P.(C) 6938/2014
S.K. INDUSTRIES PVT LTD.
...... Petitioner
Through: Mr Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
& ANR.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Vibhooti Malhotra, Junior Standing Counsel and Mr Aamir Aziz, Advocate.
CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 11.02.2016
1. The short question involved in this writ petition concerns the failure of the
Income Tax Department to pay interest on the amount of refund due to the Assessee for the period of delay in releasing the refund in terms of Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’).
2. The admitted facts are that in respect of the return of income for the Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12 filed by the Petitioner-Assessee on 28[th]September 2011, a claim for refund of a sum of Rs.20,60,160/- was made.
W.P.(C) 6938/2014 Page 1 of 4
The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act on 13[th] January, 2012 resulting in a refund of Rs. 14,65,090/-. A perusal of the intimation/order dated 13[th] January, 2012 reveals that the reason for non-processing of the refund was that “the bank account number/MICR/address is incorrect/not mentioned”. The Assessee was required to furnish the details as per enclosed response sheet and send it to CPC at the above mentioned address along with a cancelled cheque of the Assessee’s Bank account as sample, to enable the processing of the refund.
3. On 22[nd] November 2012, the Assessee wrote to the Department furnishing the complete bank details. In addition, the learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that the same MICR number had been furnished in Schedule BA of the income tax return. After the letter dated 22[nd] November, 2012, the Petitioner on 20[th] December 2012 furnished the response sheet in which the Petitioner gave the details of another bank account maintained by the State Bank of India, New Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi. The fact of the matter was that the refund cheque was in fact issued only on 27[th] May, 2014.
4. It is seen therefore that the Assessee did furnish the complete details on 20[th] December 2012 and, therefore, for the period of delay (i.e. 20[th]
W.P.(C) 6938/2014 Page 2 of 4
December 2012 to 27[th] May 2014), interest is payable by the Department. Also, the Petitioner would be entitled to further interest for the period till the actual date of payment since for no fault of the Petitioner, it was made to wait for an unreasonably long period for the refund and had to approach this Court for relief. On the other hand, there was a failure by the Department to act in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, it is directed that the Respondent-Department will within a period of two weeks from today in any event not later than 14[th] March, 2016 refund to the Petitioner the following amounts:
a) Interest on the refund amount from 20[th] December 2012 to the
date of issue of the refund cheque i.e. 27[th] May 2014 in terms of Section 244A of the Act. Section 244A of the Act.
b) Further interest at the same rate as at (i) above, on the amount
of interest due to the Petitioner as aforesaid, from 27[th] May
2014 till the date of payment of the interest in terms of this order. order.
6. If the above direction is not complied with, it will be open to the Petitioner to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.
W.P.(C) 6938/2014 Page 3 of 4
7. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2016 MK
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
a) Interest on the refund amount from 20[th] December 2012 to the
date of issue of the refund cheque i.e. 27[th] May 2014 in terms of Section 244A of the Act. Section 244A of the Act.
b) Further interest at the same rate as at (i) above, on the amount
of interest due to the Petitioner as aforesaid, from 27[th] May
2014 till the date of payment of the interest in terms of this order. order.
6. If the above direction is not complied with, it will be open to the Petitioner to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.
W.P.(C) 6938/2014 Page 3 of 4
7. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2016 MK
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
W.P.(C) 6938/2014 Page 4 of 4
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.