Case Law › High Court › S.k. Nigam & Another v. E.s.titus, A.c....

S.k. Nigam & Another v. E.s.titus, A.c. Of Income Tax & Another

High Court 10 Jul 2015 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

10 Jul 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In S.k. Nigam & Another v. E.s.titus, A.c. Of Income Tax & Another, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4389/2001 (S.K. NIGAM & ANOTHER VERSUS E.S.TITUS, A.C. OF INCOME TAX & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Mohta h/f Shri A. Parchure, counsel for the petitioners.Shri A.M. Sudame, counsel for the R-1. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIKANDPRASANNA B. VARALE,JJ.DATE:JULY 10, 2015. DATE: PURSIS ST. NO.6796/2015. Since the petitioner no.2 has expired, the name of thepetitioner no.2 may be deleted from the array of the petitioners.The amendment should be carried out forthwith. JUDGE JUDGE APTE FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4389/2001 (S.K. NIGAM & ANOTHER VERSUS E.S.TITUS, A.C. OF INCOME TAX & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Mohta h/f Shri A. Parchure, counsel for the petitioners.Shri A.M. Sudame, counsel for the R-1. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIKANDPRASANNA B. VARALE,JJ.DATE:JULY 10, 2015. Shri Mohta, the learned counsel for the petitioners,states that in view of the objection raised by the respondents to thetenability of the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India, the petitioner are desirous of challenging the order beforethe Hon'ble Supreme Court. The learned counsel seeks permissionto withdraw the writ petition, in this background. Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.