Case LawHigh Court › S.manjula v. Commissioner Of Income Tax...

S.manjula v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals-Ix)

High Court 12 Jul 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
S.manjula v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals-Ix)
Date of order
12 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2003-2004, 2004-2005
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In S.manjula v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals-Ix), the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 12.07.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.s 4162 to 4165 of 2009andM.P.s 2 to 2 of 2009 S.Manjula Vs ... Petitioner in all W.P.s 1. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-IX), 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034. 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(1), Kanchipuram. ... Respondents in all W.P.s PRAYER IN W.P. 4162 OF 2009 : Writ Petition filed underArticle 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue aWrit of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 2[nd] respondentassessment order dated 16.12.2008 in respect of assessment year2001-2002 bearing PAN No. /S-11495 and consequentialnotice of demand issued under Sec.156 of the Income Tax Act,1961 dated 16.12.2008 by the 2[nd] respondent and set aside thesame as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction. PRAYER IN W.P. 4163 OF 2009 : Writ Petition filed underArticle 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue aWrit of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 2[nd] respondentassessment order dated 16.12.2008 in respect of assessment year2002-2003 bearing PAN No. /S-11495 and consequentialnotice of demand issued under Sec.156 of the Income Tax Act,1961 dated 16.12.2008 by the 2[nd] respondent and set aside thesame as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction. PRAYER IN W.P. 4164 OF 2009 : Writ Petition filed underArticle 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue aWrit of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 2[nd] respondentassessment notice issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act,1961 dated 28.01.2009 in respect of assessment year 2003-2004bearing PAN No. , GIR No.S-11495 and set aside the sameas arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction. PRAYER IN W.P. 4165 OF 2009 : Writ Petition filed underArticle 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 2[nd] respondentassessment notice issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act,1961 dated 28.01.2009 in respect of assessment year 2004-2005bearing PAN No. , GIR No.S-11495 and set aside the sameas arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction. For Petitioner in all W.P.s : No appearanceFor Respondents in all W.P.s: Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, Senior Standing Counsel for R1 & R2 C O M M O N O R D E RWhen the above Writ Petitions were posted for hearing on05.07.2019, it was represented by the learned counsel appearingfor the petitioner that they have given change of vakalat.Therefore, these matters came to be listed with a direction toprint the name of the petitioner in the cause list. Accordingly,evidencing the name of the petitioner in the cause list, thesematters were listed today. Even today (12.07.2019), thepetitioner is called absent. Hence, these Writ Petitions aredismissed for default. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved,the liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an applicationfor restoration within a period of thirty days from the date ofreceipt of the copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, theconnected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. rppSd/- //True Copy// To1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-IX),121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034.2. TheIncome Tax Officer, Ward-I(1), Kanchipuram.+1cc to Mr.J.Narayana Swamy, Advocate, SR.No.60103
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan