Case LawHigh Court › Smt. Krishna Singh, Wife Of Prabhat Nara...

Smt. Krishna Singh, Wife Of Prabhat Narain Singh, Resident Of v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2, Patna. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward

High Court 20 Dec 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Smt. Krishna Singh, Wife Of Prabhat Narain Singh, Resident Of v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2, Patna. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward
Date of order
20 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Smt. Krishna Singh, Wife Of Prabhat Narain Singh, Resident Of v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2, Patna. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2017) decided the matter under Section 246A of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15668 of 2017 ====================================================== Smt. Krishna Singh, Wife of Prabhat Narain Singh, resident of 103, East Boring Canal Road, Police Station- Buddha Colony, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 2, Patna. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward No. 4 (5), Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. SC Mrs. Shilpi Keshri, Jr. SC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAYORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3 20-12-2017 During pendency of this matter, as the assessment proceedings have been finalized and the petitioner has already filed appeal before Commissioner of Income Tax (A)-2, Patna, as is evident from the averments made in I.A. No. 9153 of 2017, we see no reason to proceed further in the matter. The petitioner may prosecute the appeal filed. However, it is pointed out that the respondents have not withdrawn the attachment made under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act pertaining to Saving Bank Account of the petitioner and the fixed deposit and the petitioner is willing to deposit 20% of the disputed Tax amount, which, according to the petitioner, comes to Rs.36,29,518/- and it is stated that on such a condition the Bank Account should be released after Uday/- U recovery of 20% and the petitioner has already availed the alternative statutory remedy of appeal under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act and an interlocutory application with regard to the prayer before us is already pending before the appellate authority, we direct the appellate authority (respondent no.1) to hear all concerned and pass appropriate order within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan