Case LawHigh Court › S.n. Pandey Construction ( India ) Pvt....

S.n. Pandey Construction ( India ) Pvt. Ltd., C v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2, Muzaffarpur

High Court 09 Apr 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
S.n. Pandey Construction ( India ) Pvt. Ltd., C v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2, Muzaffarpur
Date of order
09 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In S.n. Pandey Construction ( India ) Pvt. Ltd., C v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2, Muzaffarpur, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal stands allowed and disposed of in theaforesaid terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.460 of 2015 ====================================================== S.N. Pandey Construction ( India ) Pvt. Ltd., C-4, Abhiyanta Nagar, AshianaRoad, P.O. Ashiana Nagar, P.S. Rajeev Nagar, Patna- 800025. ... ... Appellant/s Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 2, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ======================================================Appearance :For the Appellant/s: Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi, AAG 10For the Respondent/s: Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASADORAL JUDGMENT(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 09-04-2018 Keeping in view the order passed by us under identicalsituation on 9.2.2018 in M.A. No.310 of 2015 (M/s. MadhupKumar Singh Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax) and thefindings recorded in the said case, the case in hand appears to besquarely covered by the said judgment rendered by us. That being so, we remand the matter to the Tribunal forre-consideration of the entire issue in the light of the observationscontained in the order dated 9.2.2018 passed in M.A. No.310 of2015. The appeal stands allowed and disposed of in theaforesaid terms. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) K.C.Jha/- AFR/NAFRNAFRCAV DATEN/AUploading Date25.04.2018Transmission Date
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan