So Far As The Question v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. Reported In (2009) 319 Itr 306 (Sc
High Court
20 Sep 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
So Far As The Question v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. Reported In (2009) 319 Itr 306 (Sc
Date of order
20 Sep 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In So Far As The Question v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. Reported In (2009) 319 Itr 306 (Sc, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 6The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial questions of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IT APPEAL NO.3177-09
mmj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3177 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-7Vs.M/s. Sabero Organics Gujarat Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the AppellantMs. Vasanti Patel for the Respondent
P.C.
CORAM :V C DAGA AND R M SAVANT, JJ.DATE :20[th] September, 2010
1Heard
2Perused Appeal
3Both the questions raised in this appeal are covered by the following Judgments against the Revenue.
4So far as the question No.1 is concerned, it is covered against the Revenue by the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd. reported in (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC).
5In so far as the second question is concerned, it is also covered against
the Revenue by Judgment of this Court in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. WMI Cranes Ltd. dated 09-10-2007 bearing Appeal No.1155 of 2007 (unreported).
6The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial questions of law. No order as to costs.
[R.M.SAVANT, J]
[V C DAGA, J]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue