Income Tax Case
High Court
04 Feb 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · asghccis
Parties
— v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr Guwahati
Date of order
04 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr Guwahati, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In that circumstance,since we notice that there is no representation today, we find it appropriate to dismiss the applicationfor non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
GAHC010011482019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil) 337/2019 in ITA 1/2018
1:SHRI BASANT SURANA
S/O- KANHIYA LAL SURANA R/O- HOUSE NO. 42, BYE LANE NO. 4, TARUN NAGAR, GUWAHATI- 781005
VERSUS
1:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR GUWAHATI-1, AAYKAR BHAWAN, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI- 781005
2:THE ACIT CPC
BANGALORE POST BAG NO. 2 ELECTRONIC CITY
POST OFFICE
BANGALORE- 56010
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M L PANDIA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, INCOME TAX
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AJJIKUTTIRA SOMAIAH BOPANNAHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI
04.02.2019
[A.S. Bopanna, CJ]
ORDER
There is no representation for the applicant. Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Income
Tax, is present.
We notice that the instant application is filed seeking restoration of the appeal which wasdismissed on 19.12.2018. The order dated 19.12.2018 records the callous attitude of the appellantbeing represented when the case was taken up for hearing on the earlier dates. In that circumstance,since we notice that there is no representation today, we find it appropriate to dismiss the applicationfor non-prosecution.
The application is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Comparing Assistant
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue