Sommerville Farms Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Mubmai And Anr
High Court
13 Dec 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sommerville Farms Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Mubmai And Anr
Date of order
13 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Sommerville Farms Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Mubmai And Anr, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the SSM 3wp.2325.10 group impugned order dated 14th May, 2010 is quashed and set aside; and the matter is restored to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax-I to decide the question afresh in accordance with law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
SSM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2325 OF 2010
Sommerville Farms Private Limited
.... Petitioner
VERSUS
The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Mubmai and Anr.
.... Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2327 OF 2010
Gupta Emerald Mines Private Ltd. .... Petitioner
VERSUS
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Mubmai and Anr.
.... Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2335 OF 2010
Camellia Realty Ventures Pvt. Ltd.
.... Petitioner
VERSUS
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Mubmai and Anr..... Respondents
Mr. F. V. Irani a/w Mr. Rajesh Poojari i/b. Mind & Confreres for the Petitioner.
SSM
wp.2325.10 group
Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents.
CORAM:J. P. DEVDHAR, J.R. M. SAVANT, J.
DATED:DECEMBER 13, 2010.
P.C.:
1.Rule. Returnable forthwith. The Petitions are taken for final hearing by consent of the parties.
2.In all these Writ Petitions the Petitioners have challenged
the common order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax on 14th
May, 2010 whereby the case proceedings of the Petitioners have been
transferred from Mumbai to Jaipur. Admittedly, the Petitioners on
receipt of the notice dated 25th August, 2009, had filed objections
opposing the transfer of the case from Mumbai to Jaipur. Perusal of
the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax -I
shows that neither the objections raised by the Petitioners have been
considered nor any reason has been given for transferring the case
from Mumbai to Jaipur. In this view of the matter, the
SSM
3wp.2325.10 group
impugned order dated 14th May, 2010 is quashed and set aside; and
the matter is restored to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax-I
to decide the question afresh in accordance with law.
(R. M. SAVANT, J)
(J. P. DEVDHAR, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.