Income Tax Case
High Court
09 Jun 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
— v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the submission made by learned Junior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
W.P.No.9275 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.06.2025
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
W.P.No.9275 of 2022
andW.M.P.Nos.9033 and 9035 of 2022
ETA CONSTRUCTIONS (INDIA) LIMITED
Represented by its Director Mr.Ashraf Abdul RahmanBuhari,
S/o.Mr.Syed Abdul Rahman Buhari,Aged 52 years,No.11 and 12 Chennai City Centre,4[th] Floor, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,Mylapore, Chennai-600004.
...Petitioner
Vs.
1. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Circle-1(1), New Building, 3[rd] Floor, MG Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
2.Additional Commisioner of Income Tax,
Central Circle-1(1), New Building, 3[rd] Floor, MG Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
...Respondents
1/5
W.P.No.9275 of 2022
Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records inDIN:ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1041592350(1)dated 25.03.2022 on the file of the 1[st] Respondent relating to the A.Y.2016-17 and quash the same.
For Petitioner: Mr.G.Baskar
For Respondent : Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap Junior Standing Counsel
O R D E R
When this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Junior
Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the pursuant to the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs.Ashish Agarwal [(2022) 286 Taxman 183 (SC), the respondents once again issued notice under Section 148 A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the petitioner and subsequently passed the assessement order. Being aggrieved over the same, the petitioner filed an Appeal before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and therefore the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous.
2/5
W.P.No.9275 of 2022
2. Recording the submission made by learned Junior Standing
Counsel appearing for the respondents, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.
09.06.2025
arrIndex : yes/noNeutral Citation : yes/no
3/5
To
1. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(1), New Building, 3[rd] Floor, MG Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
2.Additional Commisioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(1), New Building, 3[rd] Floor, MG Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
4/5
5/5
W.P.No.9275 of 2022
Krishnan Ramasamy,J.,arr
W.P.No.9275 of 2022andW.M.P.Nos.9033 and 9035 of 2022
09.06.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.