Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Case

Income Tax Case

High Court 09 Jun 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording the submission made by learned Junior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.P.No.9275 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.06.2025 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy W.P.No.9275 of 2022 andW.M.P.Nos.9033 and 9035 of 2022 ETA CONSTRUCTIONS (INDIA) LIMITED Represented by its Director Mr.Ashraf Abdul RahmanBuhari, S/o.Mr.Syed Abdul Rahman Buhari,Aged 52 years,No.11 and 12 Chennai City Centre,4[th] Floor, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,Mylapore, Chennai-600004. ...Petitioner Vs. 1. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(1), New Building, 3[rd] Floor, MG Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 2.Additional Commisioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(1), New Building, 3[rd] Floor, MG Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. ...Respondents 1/5 W.P.No.9275 of 2022 Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records inDIN:ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1041592350(1)dated 25.03.2022 on the file of the 1[st] Respondent relating to the A.Y.2016-17 and quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr.G.Baskar For Respondent : Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap Junior Standing Counsel O R D E R When this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Junior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the pursuant to the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs.Ashish Agarwal [(2022) 286 Taxman 183 (SC), the respondents once again issued notice under Section 148 A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the petitioner and subsequently passed the assessement order. Being aggrieved over the same, the petitioner filed an Appeal before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and therefore the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. 2/5 W.P.No.9275 of 2022 2. Recording the submission made by learned Junior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed. 09.06.2025 arrIndex : yes/noNeutral Citation : yes/no 3/5 To 1. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(1), New Building, 3[rd] Floor, MG Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 2.Additional Commisioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(1), New Building, 3[rd] Floor, MG Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 4/5 5/5 W.P.No.9275 of 2022 Krishnan Ramasamy,J.,arr W.P.No.9275 of 2022andW.M.P.Nos.9033 and 9035 of 2022 09.06.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan