Sourabh Kumar Jha v. Union Of India
High Court
16 Jul 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Sourabh Kumar Jha v. Union Of India
Date of order
16 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Sourabh Kumar Jha v. Union Of India, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.In the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
W.P.(T) No. 6217 of 2023
....Petitioner
Sourabh Kumar Jha
Versus
1.Union of India through the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Patna Patna
2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ranchi
3.The Commissioner of Incoem Tax (Appeals) Ranchi.
4.The assessing Officer/Incoem Tax Officer (Ward-1) Ranchi.
....Respondents
---
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
---
For the Petitioner For Respondents-State
: Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate
: A.C. to A.S.G.I.
---
02/16.07.2024Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2.This writ application has been filed seeking for the following
reliefs:-
(i)For quashing part of the order dated 22.03.2022 (Annexure 8) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ranchi Bench, Ranchi in I.T.A. No.216/Ran/2018 corresponding to Assessment Year 2014-15 whereby the addition of Rs.15,93,621/- and Rs.50,250/- by Assessing Officer has been confirmed and findings of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld, while adjudicating 2[nd] and 3[rd] issue of the addition of so-called unexplained investment of Rs.15,93,621/- and Rs.50,250/- by Assessing Officer with the aid of Section 56(2)((vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 respectively in pursuance of Scrutiny Assessment and Notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act.
(ii)For quashing the order dated 27.03.2018 (Annexure 6) passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Ranchi for the Assessment Year 2014-15 upholding the Assessment Order dated 19.12.2016.
(iii)For quashing the Original Order passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act on 19.12.2016 (Annexure 4) so far as it relates to the addition of Rs.15,93,621/- as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act and addition of Rs.50,250/- as income from other sources under Section 52(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act.
(iv)For quashing fresh revised assessment order dated 30.03.2023 (Annexure 9) passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Ranchi for assessment year 2014-15.
3.In the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi, C.J.)
MM/Vedanti
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.