South India Surgical Co. Ltd v. Acit Reported
High Court
26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
South India Surgical Co. Ltd v. Acit Reported
Date of order
26 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In South India Surgical Co. Ltd v. Acit Reported, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2791 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1688 OF 2007
The CIT-8 ..Appellant
V/s.
Airborne Express India Pvt.Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mr.Suraj M.Shah, Sandip Wasnik and P.S.Sahadevan for
the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26.02.2008.
PC
1. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned.
Office to register the appeal.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1688 OF 2007
1. The Commissioner (Appeals) in his order held
that the debt which has been written off by the
appellant (assessee) was a bad debt and therefore,
held disallowance by the AO is bad in law and
consequently, directed the AO to allow
Rs.53,17,023/- as bad debts. This was clearly a
finding of fact. Revenue aggrieved, preferred an
appeal before the ITAT. Revenue relied on the
judgment of the Madras High Court in the case of
South India Surgical Co. Ltd., Vs. ACIT reported
: 2 :
in 287 ITR 62 (Mad). Tribunal found that, that
decision was rendered before the amendment to
Section 36(1)(vii) and consequently would not be
applicable to the facts of the present case.
Learned Tribunal further considered the evidence
produced by the appellant and confirmed the findings
recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) that debts
which are written off are in fact, bad debts and not
any other debts. This would be clearly a finding of
fact and in confirmity with the amended provision
and question of law as framed would not arise and
consequently, appeal dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.