Case Law › High Court › S.p. Goyal ..... Plaintiff v. The Direct...

S.p. Goyal ..... Plaintiff v. The Director Of Income Tax (Investigation) & Ors. E+

High Court 12 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

12 Jan 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In S.p. Goyal ..... Plaintiff v. The Director Of Income Tax (Investigation) & Ors. E+, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 4 case law →

$~8. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 623/1998 S.P. GOYAL ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. R.K. Sonkija, Advocate versus THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION) & ORS. E+ ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Raghvendra Singh Ms. Sonia Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel for D-3&7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI % O R D E R12.01.2016 In view of the notification No.2718/DHC/Orgl. dated 25.11.2015, issued under Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Act 23 of 2015), at the request of the counsels for the parties, the present suit is transferred to the Court of the District Judge, Patiala House Courts for further proceedings before the competent court on 29.03.2016. It is made clear that as both sides are duly represented today, no fresh notice for appearance shall be issued and the parties shall ensure their presence before the concerned Court on the aforesaid date. JANUARY 12, 2016 sr VIPIN SANGHI, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.