Spa/38/2011 Of Baker Hughes Singapore Pte v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax And Another
High Court
28 Apr 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Spa/38/2011 Of Baker Hughes Singapore Pte v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax And Another
Date of order
28 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Spa/38/2011 Of Baker Hughes Singapore Pte v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax And Another, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND ATNAINITALSPECIAL APPEAL NO. 38 of 2011
Baker Hughes Singapore Pte. ……Appellant.
Versus
Deputy Director of Income Tax and another.
……….Respondents.
Present:- Mr. P.R. Mullick, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Advocate for the respondents.
Coram:Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Barin Ghosh, C.J. (Oral)
In view of the subsequent events, the present appeal has now become infructuous, inasmuch as whatever was being sought for in the present appeal has been granted by the learned Single Judge.
The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 28.4.2011Rathour
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue