Special Range-I, Dehradun v. Ongc As Agent Of M/S Flow Petrol, Tel Bhawan, Dehradun
High Court
30 Nov 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Special Range-I, Dehradun v. Ongc As Agent Of M/S Flow Petrol, Tel Bhawan, Dehradun
Date of order
30 Nov 2005
Assessment year(s)
1991-92
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Special Range-I, Dehradun v. Ongc As Agent Of M/S Flow Petrol, Tel Bhawan, Dehradun, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: Following the above-mentioned judgment of a Division Bench of this Court, we dismiss this appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
COURT NO.2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
Income Tax Appeal No.27 of 2001
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut.
2.Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment),
Special Range-I, Dehradun.
………. Appellants
Versus
ONGC as agent of M/s Flow Petrol, Tel Bhawan, Dehradun
………. Respondent
Dated: November 30, 2005
Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent.
Coram: Hon. P.C. Verma, J.Hon. J.C.S. Rawat, J.
This appeal is against the order dated 06.06.2000, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, (Delhi Bench ‘A’ New Delhi) in ITA No.4216(Del) of 1994. The dispute relates to the Assessment Year 1991-92.
2. The substantial question of law raised in the appeal is as follows:
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was legally correct in holding the income determined on notional basis in according with Section 44BB of Income Tax Act, 1961 was not liable to be Grossed Up (multiple stage) under Section 195 A of the Income Tax Act?’’
3. An identical question of law was considered by a Division Bench of this Court in the judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut and another Vs. ONGC as agent of Cooper Engineering Services International Incorporated and connected
cases, which was reported in (2003) 264 ITR 340. In the above judgment, this Court held that the Tribunal was right in holding that Multiple Stage Grossing Up of income was not applicable to notional income under section 44BB read with section 195A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
4. Following the above-mentioned judgment of a Division Bench of this Court, we dismiss this appeal.
Rajeev Dang
(J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (P.C. Verma, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.