Spl.-H.c.a.s.,C.d.,78-E v. Learned Counsel For The
High Court
18 Mar 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Spl.-H.c.a.s.,C.d.,78-E v. Learned Counsel For The
Date of order
18 Mar 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Spl.-H.c.a.s.,C.d.,78-E v. Learned Counsel For The, the High Court (2004) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e)
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAAPPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 400 OF 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’sCourt’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. V. P. Thali with Ms. G.Pednekar, advocates for thepetitioner.
Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, advocate forthe respondents.CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J.DATE : 18th March, 2004
P.C.:
Learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks leave to withdrawthe petition as his grievance issettled. Petition dismissed aswithdrawn.
D. G. KARNIK, J.
mc.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue