Case LawHigh Court › Spl Industries Ltd v. Commissioner Of In...

Spl Industries Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 18 Jul 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Spl Industries Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
18 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Spl Industries Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~R-18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 965/2005 SPL INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Somil Agarwal and Mr. Rohit Kumar Gupta, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH O R D E R% 18.07.2019 1. This is an appeal by the Assessee against an order dated 18[th] February, 2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No. 975/Del/2003 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2000-2001. 2. While admitting this appeal by an order 18[th] October 2005, the following question of law was formulated for consideration: “Whether the interest under Section 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be charged on the tax payable under the deeming provisions of Section 115JA of the said Act?” 3. The above questions stand answered in favour of the Revenue by the ITAT by the decision of the Supreme Court in Joint Commissioner of Income Tax v. Rolta India Ltd. (2011) 330 ITR 470. 4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. JULY 18, 2019 PB S. MURALIDHAR, J. TALWANT SINGH, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan