Spring City Nirman Llp v. Heard Learned Advocates Appearing For The Parties
High Court
08 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Spring City Nirman Llp v. Heard Learned Advocates Appearing For The Parties
Date of order
08 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Spring City Nirman Llp v. Heard Learned Advocates Appearing For The Parties, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
08.04.2024.PBSl. No.31.
WPA 8514 of 2024
Spring City Nirman LLP VsIncome Tax Officer, Ward No.7(2),Kolkata & Ors.Mr. Avra Mazumder,Mr. Suman Bhowmik,Mr. Samrat Das,Ms. Alisha Das.…….for the petitioner.Mrs. Smita Das De.…….for the respondent.
Heard learned advocates appearing for theparties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has made a veryinnocuous prayer for direction upon the CIT (Appels)concerned to consider and dispose of the pendingappeal which has been filed on 16[th] April, 2015, asappears from page 31 of the writ petition.
Considering the facts and circumstances of thiscase, this writ petition being WPA 8514 of 2024, isdisposed of by directing the respondent CIT (Appeals)concerned to consider and dispose of the pendingappeal in question filed by the petitioner expeditiouslyand preferably within six months from the date ofcommunication of this order.
( Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue