Sprit Infrapower And Multiventures Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle
High Court
10 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sprit Infrapower And Multiventures Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle
Date of order
10 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sprit Infrapower And Multiventures Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
SANTOSHSUBHASHKULKARNI
Digitally signed bySANTOSH SUBHASHKULKARNIDate: 2022.01.1018:01:41 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3188 OF 2019
Sprit Infrapower and Multiventures Pvt. Ltd.
...Petitioner
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle
8(2)(2) & ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Percy Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate, i/b Jay NileshBhansali, for the Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondents.
CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJDATED:10[th] JANUARY, 2022(Video Conferencing)
-PC:
1.After the matter was heard for sometime, we find that thefollowing order will suffice to meet the ends of justice:following order will suffice to meet the ends of justice:
(a)The order impugned in the petition passed on 9[th]October, 2019, rejecting Petitioner's objections is setaside. October, 2019, rejecting Petitioner's objections is setaside.
(b)Petitioner is permitted to place on record with theAssessment Officer further submissions together withcopies of all the judgments of the Supreme Court,Apex Court and the I.T.A.T. relied upon by them inAssessment Officer further submissions together withcopies of all the judgments of the Supreme Court,Apex Court and the I.T.A.T. relied upon by them in
support of their submissions.
(c)The Assessing Officer will grant a personal hearing to
Petitioner and give at least seven days advance notice
to Petitioner.
(d)After hearing Petitioner and considering the
submissions made orally as well as in writing shall
pass a properly reasoned order on objections dealing
with each point raised by Petitioner.
2.Consequent notices dated 9[th] October, 2019, issued under
Section 143(2) and 143(1) of the Act are also set aside.
3.Petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs.
4.All rights and contentions of Petitioner are kept open.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
[K. R. SHRIRAM, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.