Case LawHigh Court › Sprit Infrapower And Multiventures Pvt....

Sprit Infrapower And Multiventures Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle

High Court 10 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sprit Infrapower And Multiventures Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle
Date of order
10 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sprit Infrapower And Multiventures Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.Petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

SANTOSHSUBHASHKULKARNI Digitally signed bySANTOSH SUBHASHKULKARNIDate: 2022.01.1018:01:41 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3188 OF 2019 Sprit Infrapower and Multiventures Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 8(2)(2) & ors. ...Respondents Mr. Percy Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate, i/b Jay NileshBhansali, for the Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondents. CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJDATED:10[th] JANUARY, 2022(Video Conferencing) -PC: 1.After the matter was heard for sometime, we find that thefollowing order will suffice to meet the ends of justice:following order will suffice to meet the ends of justice: (a)The order impugned in the petition passed on 9[th]October, 2019, rejecting Petitioner's objections is setaside. October, 2019, rejecting Petitioner's objections is setaside. (b)Petitioner is permitted to place on record with theAssessment Officer further submissions together withcopies of all the judgments of the Supreme Court,Apex Court and the I.T.A.T. relied upon by them inAssessment Officer further submissions together withcopies of all the judgments of the Supreme Court,Apex Court and the I.T.A.T. relied upon by them in support of their submissions. (c)The Assessing Officer will grant a personal hearing to Petitioner and give at least seven days advance notice to Petitioner. (d)After hearing Petitioner and considering the submissions made orally as well as in writing shall pass a properly reasoned order on objections dealing with each point raised by Petitioner. 2.Consequent notices dated 9[th] October, 2019, issued under Section 143(2) and 143(1) of the Act are also set aside. 3.Petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. 4.All rights and contentions of Petitioner are kept open. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] [K. R. SHRIRAM, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan