Squarely Covered By The Decision Of The Supreme Court In The Case Of Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tirupur v. Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd., (2016) 76 Taxmann.com 176 (Sc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA ITA NO.100104/2014 BETWEEN 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SADUM ROAD, GULBARGA 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2(3), BANGALORE (BY SRI. TULAJAPPA KALABURAGI, ADV.) ... APPELLANTS AND M/S V S LAD & SONS PRASANTH NIVAS, KRISHNA NAGAR, SANDUR - 583120 BELLARY DISTRICT PAN: (BY SRI. A.SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL) ... RESPONDENT THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED IN ITA NO.146/BANG/2013 DATED 13.06.2014 ON THE FILE OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘C’ BENCH, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AND ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED BY THEASSESSEE. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr.Tulajappa Kalaburagi, learned counsel for the appellants. 2. Mr.A.Shankar, learned Senior counsel for the respondent. 3. Heard on the question of admission. 4. The appeal is admitted on following substantial question of law. “Whether the Tribunal committed an error of law in holding that the loss incurred in respect of wind mill cannot be carried forward notionally for setting of such loss from profit in subsequent years, while computing deduction under Section 80IA in respect of said wind mill ignoring the specific provisions of Section 80IA(5)?” 5. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, same is heard finally. 6. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the parties jointly submitted that the controversy involved in the instant appeal is squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Tirupur vs. Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd., (2016) 76 taxmann.com 176 (SC). In view of aforesaid submission and for the reasons assigned by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Tirupur supra, the substantial question of law framed by this Court is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. In the result, the order dated 13.06.2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal insofar as it pertains to disallowing of the loss incurred in respect of wind mill notionally for the subsequent years is hereby quashed. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE Rsh