Case LawHigh Court › S.rajendran v. The Commissioner Of Incom...

S.rajendran v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Income Tax Office, Bibikulam, Madurai-2

High Court 01 Apr 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
S.rajendran v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Income Tax Office, Bibikulam, Madurai-2
Date of order
01 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In S.rajendran v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Income Tax Office, Bibikulam, Madurai-2, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For R1 to R3: Mrs.S.Srimathy Special Government PleaderO R D E RThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of thisCourt to withdraw the instant Writ Petition and he has also made anendorsement to that effect in the court bundle. ly, the instant Writ Peti...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2019 CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.(MD).22011 of 2016 S.Rajendran... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax Office, Bibikulam, Madurai-2. 2.The Income Tax Recovery Officer-I, Income Tax Office, Bibikulam, Madurai-2. 3.The Income Tax Recovery Officer-II, Income Tax Office, Bibikulam, Madurai-2. 4.Prabhakaran5.Saravanan @ Subramanian6.R.S.Manian7.Ponnusamy 8.Vijayan 9.Senthilvel10.Murugesan11.R.Kathiresan12.Samaya Karuppaiah13.Suresh14.T.R.Dhinakaran... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the firstrespondent to keep the petitioner's attached properties as it is,till the disposal of the petition for lifting of attachment pendingon the file of the first respondent, based on the petitioner'srepresentation dated 01.11.0216 made to the first respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For R1 to R3: Mrs.S.Srimathy Special Government PleaderO R D E RThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of thisCourt to withdraw the instant Writ Petition and he has also made anendorsement to that effect in the court bundle. ly, the instant Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, thereshall be no order as to costs. Sd/ Assistant Registar(CS-I) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) rmiTo1.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax Office, Bibikulam, Madurai-2.2.The Income Tax Recovery Officer-I, Income Tax Office, Bibikulam, Madurai-2.3.The Income Tax Recovery Officer-II, Income Tax Office, Bibikulam, Madurai-2.+1cc to Mr.c.M.Arumugam, Advocate in SR No.58734 W.P.(MD).22011 of 2016 NM/PS/02.05.2019/2P/5C
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan