Case LawHigh Court › S.ravi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax...

S.ravi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii

High Court 10 Nov 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
S.ravi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii
Date of order
10 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In S.ravi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2 2.Even today (10.11.2017), there is no representation for thepetitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents is present.Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.11.2017C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P.(MD)No.1050 of 2011 S.Ravi ... PetitionerVs. 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, No.108, Mahathma Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Cirlce II, Income tax Department, New Building, Kulamangalam Road, Meenambalpuram, Madurai-2. 3.The Tax Recovery Officer, Central Range, Income Tax Department, New Building, Kulamangalam Road, Meenambalpuram, Madurai-2....Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution ofIndia, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for therecords relating to the impugned order dated 13.10.2010 inC.No.2747B/C-II/2010-11/1 on the file of 1[st] respondent and quash thesame and consequently direct the 1[st] respondent to waive the interestcharged under Section 220(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for theassessment years 2001-02, 2002-03, 2004-05 and 2005-06. O R D E R When the matter came up for hearing on 27.10.2017 and03.11.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner andhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/hence, the same was directed to be posted on 10.11.2017, under thecaption 'for dismissal'. 2 2.Even today (10.11.2017), there is no representation for thepetitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents is present.Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Nocosts.Sd/-Assistant Registrar(AE)/True Copy/ Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, No.108, Mahathma Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034.2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Cirlce II, Income tax Department, New Building, Kulamangalam Road, Meenambalpuram, Madurai-2.3.The Tax Recovery Officer, Central Range, Income Tax Department, New Building, Kulamangalam Road, Meenambalpuram, Madurai-2.+1cc to M/S.S.Srimathy, Advocate SR.No. 86512 W.P.(MD)No.1050 of 2011 taJM/MR KKR/SAR 1/23.11.2017/2P/5C
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan