Sreemaa Associates Private Limited v. Assistance Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Cebtre 1(1)(2), Delhi & Ors
High Court
29 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Sreemaa Associates Private Limited v. Assistance Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Cebtre 1(1)(2), Delhi & Ors
Date of order
29 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
2020-2021
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Sreemaa Associates Private Limited v. Assistance Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Cebtre 1(1)(2), Delhi & Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
29.08.2023 Sl no. 15 Ct no. 2 P.M.
WPA 18685 OF 2023
Sreemaa Associates Private Limited - Vs -
Assistance Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment CEBTRE 1(1)(2), Delhi & Ors.
Mr. Avra Mazumder, Ms. Alisha Das, Mr. Suman Bhowmik Mr. Samrat Das
… for the petitioner … for the respondent
Mr. Om Narayan Rai
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order dated 20[th]September, 2022 under Section 144, read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to assessment year 2020-2021, on the ground that the reply to the show-cause notice filed by the petitioner has not been properly considered and on hyper technical ground that in one place in the impugned order it has been recorded that no reply to the show-cause notice has been filed which in fact in the other part of the order it has been recorded that the reply was filed and on perusal of the impugned assessment
order I find that the contentions raised by the petitioner in its reply to the show-cause notice was considered in the impugned assessment order and if the petitioner is not satisfied with the reasonings and findings in the assessment order, the appropriate forum for raising such grievance is the appellate authority to scrutinize or re-appreciate the facts and findings based on evidence.
Petitioner submits that due to serious medical illness by the Director of the petitioner by the disease of Cancer he could not pursue the remedy before the appellate authority at this stage because it has become time barred and in support of such plea of medical problem petitioner has annexed medical documents to the writ petition.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and submission of the parties and the medical ground of serious illness of the petitioner’s Director, without going into the merit of the impugned assessment order this writ petition being WPA 18685 of 2023 is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to file the statutory appeal within two weeks from date, as an extraordinary exceptional case of serious medical illness. If the appeal is filed within the time stipulated herein the appellate
authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the appeal on merit and in accordance with law without raising the point of limitation.
(Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.