Sreeni Parameswaranernakulam, Pin v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
High Court
14 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Sreeni Parameswaranernakulam, Pin v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
Date of order
14 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sreeni Parameswaranernakulam, Pin v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
TUESDAY, THE 14 DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1944WP(C) NO. 8567 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
SREENI PARAMESWARANERNAKULAM, PIN - 682308BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNA
7/42 - B5, MYSTIC BELLS VILLA NO -1,
EROOR DESOM, NADAMA VILLAGE,
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CORPORATE CIRCLE-2 (1), I.S. PRESS ROAD, KOCHI, PIN - 682018
CORPORATE CIRCLE-2 (1), I.S. PRESS ROAD,
2THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,1ST FLOOR, BLOCK C-I & C-II,
KENDRIYA BHAVAN, KAKKANAD,
ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682037
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL ITD
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 14.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
------------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C)No.8567 of 2023
-------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 14[th] day of March, 2023
J U D G M E N T
Ext.P1 is the assessment order in respect of the
year 2011-2012. Against the said order, the petitioner hadpreferred Ext.P3 appeal before the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, which wasrejected by Ext.P2 order. Aggrieved by the said order, thepetitioner has filed Ext.P3 appeal along with Ext.P4 staypetition. The petitioner seeks for an expeditious disposal ofExts.P3 and P4.
2.Heard the learned Standing Counsel for therespondents.
Having heard both sides, I am inclined to dispose ofthe writ petition, with direction to the second respondent totake up Ext.P4 stay petition and pass orders on the same,
within a period of two months from the date of receipt of acopy of this judgment. Till a decision is taken as directedabove, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 assessmentorder shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
rkj
VIJU ABRAHAM
JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8567/2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.