Case LawHigh Court › Sreeni Parameswaranernakulam, Pin v. Men...

Sreeni Parameswaranernakulam, Pin v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna

High Court 14 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Sreeni Parameswaranernakulam, Pin v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
Date of order
14 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sreeni Parameswaranernakulam, Pin v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM TUESDAY, THE 14 DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1944WP(C) NO. 8567 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: SREENI PARAMESWARANERNAKULAM, PIN - 682308BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNA 7/42 - B5, MYSTIC BELLS VILLA NO -1, EROOR DESOM, NADAMA VILLAGE, RESPONDENTS: 1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CORPORATE CIRCLE-2 (1), I.S. PRESS ROAD, KOCHI, PIN - 682018 CORPORATE CIRCLE-2 (1), I.S. PRESS ROAD, 2THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,1ST FLOOR, BLOCK C-I & C-II, KENDRIYA BHAVAN, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682037 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL ITD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 14.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VIJU ABRAHAM, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.8567 of 2023 ------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14[th] day of March, 2023 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 is the assessment order in respect of the year 2011-2012. Against the said order, the petitioner hadpreferred Ext.P3 appeal before the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, which wasrejected by Ext.P2 order. Aggrieved by the said order, thepetitioner has filed Ext.P3 appeal along with Ext.P4 staypetition. The petitioner seeks for an expeditious disposal ofExts.P3 and P4. 2.Heard the learned Standing Counsel for therespondents. Having heard both sides, I am inclined to dispose ofthe writ petition, with direction to the second respondent totake up Ext.P4 stay petition and pass orders on the same, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of acopy of this judgment. Till a decision is taken as directedabove, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 assessmentorder shall be kept in abeyance. Sd/- rkj VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8567/2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan