Sri Ambal Mills Ltd v. The Recovery Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIANand THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE KUMARESH BABU W.A.No.3551 of 2019 and CMP.No.22805 of 2019 The Management Sri Ambal Mills Ltd.,No.89, Rathina Sabapathy StreetCooperative ColonyCoimbatore - 641 038.Rep by C.D.Menon, Director. .... Appellant Vs 1.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organisation Regional Office, Bhavishyanidhi Bhavan P.B.No.3875, Dr.Balasundaram Road Coimbatore - 641 018. Employees Provident Fund Organisation Regional Office, Bhavishyanidhi Bhavan P.B.No.3875, Dr.Balasundaram Road Coimbatore - 641 018. 2.The Recovery Officer Employees Provident Fund Organisation Regional Office, Bhavishyanidhi Bhavan P.B.No.3875, Dr.Balasundaram Road Coimbatore - 641 018. Regional Office, Bhavishyanidhi Bhavan P.B.No.3875, Dr.Balasundaram Road Coimbatore - 641 018. .... Respondents W.A.No.3551 of 2019 Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order passed in W.P.No.693 of 2013 dated 11.06.2019 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.R.Raghavan for Mr.S.Jayaraman For Respondents : Mr.C.Kulanthaivelu JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN.J] It is seen from the order of the learned Single Judge that the petitioner was not represented when the writ petition in W.P.No.693 of 2013 came to be disposed of on 11.06.2019. 2. Mr.R.Raghavan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the appellant/petitioner would be satisfied with an opportunity of being heard in the writ petition. 3. Considering the fact that the appellant/petitioner was not represented by a counsel in the writ petition, and the writ petition came to be disposed of on merits, we are of the considered opinion that the appellant/petitioner should be W.A.No.3551 of 2019 given a chance to argue the writ petition before the learned Single Judge. Hence, without going into the merits of the rival claims, the writ appeal is allowed and the order of the learned Single Judge dated 11.06.2019 in W.P.No.693 of 2013 is set aside on the ground that it is an exparte order and the matter is remitted to learned Single Judge for being disposed of in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes / NoSpeaking order / Non-speaking orderds 27.09.2022 1.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organisation Regional Office, Bhavishyanidhi Bhavan P.B.No.3875, Dr.Balasundaram Road Coimbatore - 641 018. Employees Provident Fund Organisation Regional Office, Bhavishyanidhi Bhavan P.B.No.3875, Dr.Balasundaram Road Coimbatore - 641 018. 2.The Recovery Officer Employees Provident Fund Organisation Regional Office, Bhavishyanidhi Bhavan P.B.No.3875, Dr.Balasundaram Road Coimbatore - 641 018. Employees Provident Fund Organisation Regional Office, Bhavishyanidhi Bhavan P.B.No.3875, Dr.Balasundaram Road Coimbatore - 641 018. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis4/4 4/4 W.A.No.3551 of 2019 R.SUBRAMANIAN. J., ds W.A.No.3551 of 2019and CMP.No.22805 of 2019 27.09.2022