Case LawHigh Court › Sri Anand Jewellersrepresented By Its Ma...

Sri Anand Jewellersrepresented By Its Managing v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle 2,Trichy-620 015

High Court 06 Oct 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Sri Anand Jewellersrepresented By Its Managing v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle 2,Trichy-620 015
Date of order
06 Oct 2025
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Sri Anand Jewellersrepresented By Its Managing v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle 2,Trichy-620 015, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.P(MD)No.27422 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)No.27422 of 2025 andW.M.P.(MD)Nos.21353 & 21354 of 2025 Sri Anand JewellersRepresented by its Managing Partner,Mr.Anandraj Karuppannan337, G Mettu Street, Adjacent to Ram Theatre,Elambalur Road,Perambalur,Tamil Nadu-621 212. ... Petitioner Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle 2,Trichy-620 015. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent contained in its notice issued by the respondent under section 274 read with Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 bearing DIN and Notice No.ITBA/PNL/S/270A/2025-26/1080757775(1) dated 16.09.2025 for AY 2018-19, PAN , and Notices issued under Section 274 read with Section 271AAC(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, bearing DIN and Notice NO.ITBA/PNL/S/271AAC(1)/2025-26/1080757754(1), dated 16.09.2025 for AY 2018-19, PAN , and quash the same as arbitrary, unjust and illegal. 1/3 For Petitioner For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilipkumar : Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy W.P(MD)No.27422 of 2025 ORDER Heard both sides. 2. What is under challenge is the notice proposing to levy penalty. Even before the writ petition could be listed for admission, the final order has been passed. The petitioner has filed a fresh writ petition assailing the final order. The petitioner can very well canvass all the contentions now raised in this writ petition filed against the final order. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. Index Internetrmi : Yes / No : Yes/ No 06.10.2025 2/3 3/3 W.P(MD)No.27422 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi W.P(MD)No.27422 of 2025 06.10.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan