Sri. Arikkat Vijayan Menonsri. Harisankar v. Menon, Smt. Meera. V. Menon And Smt. Krishna.k
High Court
15 May 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Sri. Arikkat Vijayan Menonsri. Harisankar v. Menon, Smt. Meera. V. Menon And Smt. Krishna.k
Date of order
15 May 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sri. Arikkat Vijayan Menonsri. Harisankar v. Menon, Smt. Meera. V. Menon And Smt. Krishna.k, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE GOPINATH.P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 15 DAY OF MAY,2020/25TH VAISAKHA, 1942
W.P(C) NO. 9948 OF 2020
PETITIONER ::
THE KONGAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. P 538, KONGAD POST, PALAKKAD – 678 631, REPRESENTED BY ITSSECRETARY, SHYLA K.,AGED 55, D/O. C. GANGADHARAN NAIR.
BY ADVS.
SRI. ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENONSRI. HARISANKAR. V. MENON, SMT. MEERA. V. MENON AND SMT. KRISHNA.K.,
RESPONDENTS::
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD 2, AYAKAR BHAVAN,PALAKKAD – 678 014.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),THRISSUR – 680 021.THRISSUR – 680 021.
3. THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
AYAKAR BHAVAN,KAKKANADU, KOCHI – 682 030, REPRESENTED BY ITSREGISTRAR.
THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.05.2020,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Dated this the 15th day of May, 2020
JUDGMENT
This writ petition has been filed praying inter-alia for a direction to the 3rd respondent Tribunal toconsider and pass orders on an application for stay. 2.The petitioner claimed the benefit of Section80P of the Income Tax Act. This claim was rejected bythe Assessing Officer as well as by the Commissioner(Appeals).
3.The petitioner places reliance on thejudgment of a Division Bench of this Court, which isproduced as Ext.P5 along with W.P.(C). No.9768/2020.The Division Bench has in similar circumstances,directed the Appellate Tribunal to consider and passorders on the stay petition within a period of fourmonths from the date of receipt of a copy of thejudgment and further directed that any proceedingsinitiated for recovery of amounts due from thepetitioner shall be kept in abeyance till orders arepassed on the stay petition and communicated to thepetitioner.
4.In the light of the above, this writ petitionis disposed of directing the 3rd respondent, theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kochi Bench, toconsider and pass orders on the stay petition markedas Ext.P4 in this writ petition, within a period offour months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment. Till orders are so passed and communicatedto the petitioner, steps (if any) initiated by theIncome Tax Department for recovery of amounts dueunder the assessment order, shall be kept in abeyance.With these directions, this writ petition isdisposed of.
Sd/-
GOPINATH.P, JUDGE
pm
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
EXT. P1. COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1 RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 27-12-2019.
EXT. P2. COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2 RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 03-03-2020.
EXT. P3.COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 3 RESPONDENT DATED 05-05-2020.
EXT. P4.COPY OF PETITION FOR STAY FILED BEFORE THE 3 RESPONDENT DATED 05-05-2020.
EXT. P5.COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)-TMP – 36/2020 OF THEHON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 11-04-2020.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.