Sri. B v. Murthys/O Sri. J. Venkataramanaiah

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU| DATED THIS THE 25 DAY OF FEBRUARY 20277. PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’/BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANLR.P. NO.1/76 OF 202 BETWEEN: SRI. B VS MURTHY|S/O SRI. J. VENKATARAMANAIAH,AGED ABOUT /3 YEARS.B-004, “VAISHANAVI PARADISE4/71H CROSS, 81TH BLOCJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU 560 O70.| (By Sri. PAWAN KUMAR, ADV., FOR|Sri. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.,) .., PETITIONER AND* THE INCOME TAX OFFICER|WARD 15(1)ROOM NO. 59, HMT BUILDING|BELLARY ROAD, BENGALURU 560 032. (By Sri. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) .., RESPONDENT THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 4/7 RULE 1R/W_SECTION114OFCPC,|PRAYING|TO|A) REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 19/02/2020 PASSED IN ITA.NO. 397/2010 AND MODIFY PARAGRAPH 7 OF THE JUDGMENT.B) PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE.COURT DEEMS FIT ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE.CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.| THIS R.P. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, |ALOK ARADHE J.,MADE THE FOLLOWING: | ORDER After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it isdirected that in the 15th line of para 7 of the judgment dated19.02.2021 passed by this court in ITA No.397/10, the words‘Snort Term Capital Gains shall be read as Long Term|Capital Gains. This order snail be read in conjunction witnthe judgment dated 19.09.2021 passed in ITA No.397/10. Accordingly, review petition is disposed of. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-|JUDGE