Case LawHigh Court › Sri Rajendra Prasad, Son Of Late Devi Du...

Sri Rajendra Prasad, Son Of Late Devi Dutt Mittal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Patna

High Court 09 May 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Sri Rajendra Prasad, Son Of Late Devi Dutt Mittal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Patna
Date of order
09 May 2011
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Sri Rajendra Prasad, Son Of Late Devi Dutt Mittal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Patna, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: Petition is rejected on the ground of availability of alternative remedy.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.875 of 2011 ====================================================== Sri Rajendra Prasad, son of Late Devi Dutt Mittal, aged about 65 years, resident of Mittal Sadan, East Boring Canal Road, P.O. Boring Road, P.S. Buddha Colony in the town and district of Patna. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1.Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Patna. 2.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle5, Patna. 3.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle5, Patna. 4.Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Central Secretariat, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001. Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Central Secretariat, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Sr. Standing Counsel Mrs. Archana Sinha, Jr. Standing Counsel ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 5. 9.5.2011. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is filed against the order of reassessment made for the assessment year 2005-06. Petitioner has alternative remedy under the Statute. Petition is rejected on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) Pawan/- (Jyoti Saran, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan