Sri Subodh Sharma v. The Union Of India
High Court
24 Mar 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Sri Subodh Sharma v. The Union Of India
Date of order
24 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Sri Subodh Sharma v. The Union Of India, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: Petition is summarily rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1585 of 2014
======================================================
M/s Sujeet Builders India Private limited having office at Belbanwa, P.O.-Motihari, P.S.-Motihari Town, Distt.-East Champaran through its Director
Sri Subodh Sharma. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1.The Union of India through the Commissioner, Income Tax, Muzaffarpur, P.O. & Distt.-Muzaffarpur.
2.Deputy Commissioner, Income Tax Circle 1 at Bela Kothi, P.O. Distt.-Muzaffarpur. (the then assessing officer)
3.Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax Circle 1, at Bela Kothi P.O.
Distt.-Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nand Kishore Singh, Advocate
For the Respondents : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Senior Standing Counsel
Mrs. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Jr. S.C.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
And
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
3 24-03-2014
Admittedly the petitioner, an assessee, has alternative statutory remedy of appeal before the appellate authority in the subject matter of this Petition.
Petition is summarily rejected.
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
Sanjeet/-
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.