Case LawHigh Court › Sri Thangam Agencies v. Assessment Uniti...

Sri Thangam Agencies v. Assessment Unitincome Tax Departmentnational Faceless Assessment Centrenew Delhi

High Court 12 Dec 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Sri Thangam Agencies v. Assessment Unitincome Tax Departmentnational Faceless Assessment Centrenew Delhi
Date of order
12 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Sri Thangam Agencies v. Assessment Unitincome Tax Departmentnational Faceless Assessment Centrenew Delhi, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.P.No.8895 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.12.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P.No.8895 of 2024and W.M.P.Nos. 9906 and 9907 of 2024 Sri Thangam Agencies,No.12, Old 46/2,Zubedhar Hussain Street,Border Thottam, Royapettah,Chennai 600 014.(Represented by its Proprietor Sankar Saravanan) ...Petitioner Vs. Assessment UnitIncome Tax DepartmentNational Faceless Assessment CentreNew Delhi. ...Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent in impugned order issued vide Reference No.ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1052741179(1) dated 11.05.2023 and quash the same and consequentially direct the respondent to grant sufficient opportunity of being heard and decide in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Jitendra Kumar W.P.No.8895 of 2024 For Respondent: Dr.B.Ramaswamy, Senior Standing Counsel. ORDER Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that they may be granted liberty to file an appeal challenging the impugned order. 2. It was not seriously objected to by the learned counsel for the respondent. 3. In view thereof, the writ petition stands closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the impugned order by way of an appeal(s) if they are so advised within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If such appeal(s) is filed, the Appellate Authority shall, subject to the petitioner complying with the statutory conditions relating to appeal including pre-deposit, entertain the same W.P.No.8895 of 2024 without reference to limitation. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 12.12.2024 Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderIndex:Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Noshk To Assessment UnitIncome Tax DepartmentNational Faceless Assessment CentreNew Delhi. MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. W.P.No.8895 of 2024 shk W.P.No.8895 of 2024andW.M.P.Nos. 9906 and 9907 of 2024 12.12.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan