Sri. Y v. Raviraj Learned Counsel For The Revenue
High Court
10 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Sri. Y v. Raviraj Learned Counsel For The Revenue
Date of order
10 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sri. Y v. Raviraj Learned Counsel For The Revenue, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.For the reasons assigned by us in the order dated 10.10.2019 in ITA No.100037/2018, the instant appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.M. PATIL
I.T.A. NO.100029 OF 2018
BETWEEN
1.THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), BENGALURU.
2.DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S STAR PVG EXPORTS, C/O PRASANNA V GHOTAGE, 202, CHIDAMBAR NAGAR, ANGOL, BELAGAVI-590006, PAN: AAFFS 2661 H.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SANGRAM S.KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI IN IT(SS)A NO.82/PAN/2016, DATED 07.12.2017 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER DATED
21.03.2014 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BELAGAVI FOR THE A.Y.2007-08 AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri. Y. V. Raviraj learned counsel for the Revenue.
2.Sri. Sangram S Kulkarni, learned counsel for the respondent.
3.Heard on the question of admission.
4.For the reasons assigned by us in the
order dated 10.10.2019 in ITA No.100037/2018,
the instant appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
yan
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue