Sri.harisankar v. Menon
High Court
07 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
07 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
FRIDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 16TH BHADRA 1929
WP(C).No. 26670 of 2007(Y)
--------------------------
PETITIONER:
------------
A.FIROSE, JANATHA RUBBERS,
VANDAZHY, PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON
SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
RESPONDENTS:
-------------
1. AGRLINCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
ALATHUR.
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
DEPT. OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
ERNAKULAM.
3. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
DEPT. OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
CHITTUR, PALAKKAD.
BY G.P. SRI.SREEKRISHNA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 07/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
....................................................................
....................................................................
Dated this the 7th day of September, 2007.
JUDGMENT
Since petitioner has filed appeal against sales tax assessment for
2003-2004 and counsel contended that petitioner has obtained Form No.25,W.P. is disposed of granting stay against recovery proceedings till disposalof appeal on petitioner remitting rupees fifteen thousand within one monthfrom now. The appellate authority is directed to take up the appeal out ofturn and dispose of the same within three months from the date of makingpayment as above.
W.P. is disposed of as above.
pms
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.