Case LawHigh Court › Sri.harisankar v. Menon

Sri.harisankar v. Menon

High Court 04 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
04 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Writ petition is disposed of as above. aks (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2008 / 13TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 20199 of 2008(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ GEORGE JOSEDPH, POYYANI HOUSE KOZHENCHERRY BY ADV. SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON RESPONDENTS: ------------- AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND SALES TAX OFFICER, RANNI. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV.SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 20199 OF 2008 D ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 4[th] day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T Prayer in the writ petition is to implement appellate/revisional orders obtained by the petitioner and toeffect refund of excess tax paid by him for the years 1979-80to 2000-01 with interest forthwith. I heard learnedGovernment Pleader also. There will be a direction to therespondenttotakestepstoimplementExts.P3, P4 and P5 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,within a period of three months from the date of receipt of acopy of this judgment. The petitioner has another complaintrelating to refund of excess tax paid by him. LearnedGovernment Pleader points out Ext.P11 and submits that thepetitioner can co-operate to trace out the documents withintwo months. According to the petitioner, he is willing to co-operate and make available remittance challans. In the lightof the submission, there will be a further direction that upon WPC.20199/08 : 2 : the petitioner producing remittance challans, the respondentwill settle the claims of the petitioner within six weeks from the date of such challans are produced before him. Writ petition is disposed of as above. aks (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan