Sri.harisankar v. Menon
High Court
13 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
13 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of directing thesecond respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P6 toP8 stay petitions in accordance with law, within three weeksfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2008 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1930
WP(C).No. 17641 of 2008(A)
---------------------------------------------
PETITIONER:
------------------
MATHAI SAMUEL, HILL PRODUCE DEALER,
CHITTAR, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST.
BY ADV. SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON
SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
SMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
----------------------
1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL
TAX OFFICER, RANNY.
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
KOLLAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C.K. GOVINDAN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 13/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
K. M. JOSEPH, J.
--------------------------------------
W.P.C. NO. 17641 OF 2008 A
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 13th June, 2008
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has preferred Exts.P3 to P5 Appealsaccompanied by Exts.P6 to P8 stay petitions, feeling aggrievedby the orders of assessment. Heard the learned GovernmentPleader also. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing thesecond respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P6 toP8 stay petitions in accordance with law, within three weeksfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. Till suchtime as a decision is taken as aforesaid, recovery proceedingsinitiated against the petitioner pursuant to the assessment orderswill be kept in abeyance.
Petitioner will produce a copy of this Judgment before thesecond respondent as soon as it is made available to him.
K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE
kbk.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.