Sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
High Court
05 Oct 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
05 Oct 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 13TH ASWINA, 1942
WP(C).No.20689 OF 2020(I)
PETITIONER:
THE MANNARKKAD TALUK CO-OP. EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO. P 629, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD 678 582,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.K. MOHANDAS.
BY ADVS.
SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 4, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD 678 014.WARD 4, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD 678 014.
THUSHARA V JAMES GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON05.10.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 5th day of October 2020
This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
“To direct the 3[rd] respondent to dispose of Ext.P3appeal and Ext.P4 stay petition by the issue of a writ ofmandamus or such other writ or order or direction.”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that
as against Ext.P1 order of assessment, the petitioner has submittedExt.P3 appeal and Ext.P4 stay petition before the 3[rd] respondent. It issubmitted that hasty steps are being taken for recovery of amountson the basis of Ext.P1, without considering the appeal or theapplication for stay.
4. The learned Standing Counsel submits that the appeal
preferred by the petitioner will be considered and disposed ofwithout delay.
There will, accordingly, be a direction to the 3[rd] respondent to
take up, consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 appeal, after
3
hearing the parties, within a period of six months from the date of
receipt of a copy of this judgment. Coercive proceedings pursuant to
Ext.P1 shall be kept in abeyance till then.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
SVP
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 28.12.2018.
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 15.9.2020.
EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 26.09.2020.
EXHIBIT P4
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 26.09.2020.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.